|
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
02-14-2018, 05:22 AM
|
#1 |
|
Salt Miner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: gone to Far Harad
Posts: 987
|
Mea cupla! My bad.
Valandil is right. AD 2000 was a leap year. What made it different was that it was a centennial year (evenly divisible by 100) that was a leap year. AD 1900 was not a leap year. AD 2100 will not be a leap year. But AD 2400 will be. Thank you for the compliment, Valandil. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LoTR Discussion: Appendix D | Forkbeard | LOTR Discussion Project | 7 | 01-11-2008 04:00 PM |
| The Heirlooms of Arnor | Gordis | Lord of the Rings Books | 31 | 04-17-2006 04:33 AM |
| Why did the Early Kings of Gondor live longer than the Kings of Arnor? | Valandil | Middle Earth | 8 | 05-24-2004 07:50 AM |
| We Love Jona-Thong 2003 Calendar | Ruinel | General Messages | 95 | 10-31-2003 01:00 AM |
| LOTR movie calendar available | ladyeve2 | Lord of the Rings Movies | 1 | 02-19-2001 02:00 AM |
Hybrid Mode
