Entmoot
 


Go Back   Entmoot > J.R.R. Tolkien > Lord of the Rings Movies
FAQ Members List Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-13-2010, 10:56 AM   #19
Peregrina_Took
Hobbit
 
Peregrina_Took's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere on the edge of insanity!
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galin View Post

Then possibly have Legolas meet Aragorn and the hobbits... sure it's not great, but if all directors really must run away from introducing 'a character that essentially vanishes later', like Glorfindel, well in that case I find it superior to using Arwen here, at least.

They had Legolas instead of Glorfindel in the animated Bakshi film (I think I spelled that right). The problem with Legolas is that even in the book, he's a minor character. An important minor character, but a minor character none the less. I guess they thought Arwen had more relevancy.
__________________
The closer we are to danger, the farther we are from harm
Peregrina_Took is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A second death Sister Golden Hair Middle Earth 26 11-11-2004 03:34 PM
Question about Arwen & Glorfindel.... Dúnedain Middle Earth 58 01-22-2003 08:33 PM
Boo hoo Arwen straight_face Lord of the Rings Movies 4 01-18-2003 12:16 AM
Worse than bumpin' Glorfindel and adding Arwen.... Evenstar Lord of the Rings Movies 36 03-18-2002 01:22 PM
just a dumb question.... ArwenEvenstar The Silmarillion 32 11-01-2001 08:26 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 1997-2019, The Tolkien Trail